<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Take Three &#187; Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetakethree.com/tag/controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetakethree.com</link>
	<description>Our take on movies. What&#039;s yours?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative bloggers anti- &#8220;The Blind Side&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.thetakethree.com/2009/11/24/conservative-bloggers-anti-the-blind-side/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetakethree.com/2009/11/24/conservative-bloggers-anti-the-blind-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thetakeonmovies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In Theaters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Controversy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetakethree.com/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the L.A. Times blog The Big Picture today, conservatives are taking aim at sports drama &#8220;The Blind Side&#8221; because of a shot taken at George W. Bush during the film. But the movie has a positive message and bloggers are way off, they say: Big Hollywood&#8217;s John Nolte, for example, used the joke [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">According to the L.A. Times blog The Big Picture today, conservatives are taking aim at sports drama &#8220;The Blind Side&#8221; because of a shot taken at George W. Bush during the film. But the movie has a positive message and bloggers are way off, they say:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 20px; text-align: left; padding: 0px;">Big Hollywood&#8217;s John Nolte, for example, used the joke as a launching pad for a furious attack on leftist Hollywood, calling it &#8220;the single most intolerant industry in America today&#8221; and an industry &#8220;engaged in an ideological war with traditional conservative America.&#8221;</p>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 20px; text-align: left; padding: 0px;">But how could Hollywood be such a snake pit of lefty lock-step America hating if it allowed a filmmaker to make a mainstream studio picture that painted such a warm, affirmative portrait of an evangelical Christian family? Nolte proposes the wildly paranoid theory that even if you are a conservative working in Hollywood, you have to placate the Bush-hating liberals by taking shots at conservatives in your movies.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 20px; text-align: left; padding: 0px;"><span style="line-height: 19px; ">We say it&#8217;s a sports movie, and we like our sports movies sans politics. Read <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/11/20/why-the-gratuitous-bush-bash-in-blind-side-ill-tell-you-why/" target="_blank">conservative blogger Nolte&#8217;s</a> opinion and read the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big_picture/2009/11/john-lee-hancock-responds-to-rightwing-attacks-on-the-blind-side.html" target="_blank">L.A. Times posting</a> and decide for yourself.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetakethree.com/2009/11/24/conservative-bloggers-anti-the-blind-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

